Zambia, 1995

All Years for Zambia: 2016 — 2013 — 2007 — 2002 — 1998 — 1995

1995 Summary Totals for Zambia

Data Category	Definite	Probable	Possible
Aerial or Ground Total Counts	97	0	0
Aerial or Ground Sample Counts	19,605	6,573	6,573
Informed Guesses, Undocumented Aerial or Dung Surveys and GIS Extrapolations	0	0	155
Total	19,702	6,573	6,728

No changes between current and previous report.

Zambia : Elephant Estimates

	Survey Details²			Number of Elephants				Area	Map Location
Input Zone	Type	Reliab.	Year	Estimate	95% C.L.	Source	PFS³	(km²)	Lon.	Lat.
Chete Island	AT3	A	1991	49	0	Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	4	32	27.6E	17.4S
Chiawa Game Management Area ns	AS1	B	1991	31	36	Chanda & Tembo, 1993	2	2,344
Chisomo Game Management Area	AS3	B	1994	469	1,006	Jachmann & Kalyocha, 1994	2	3,450	30.6E	13.7S
Isangano National Park	GT1	A	1993	3		Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	3	840	30.6E	11.2S
Kafinde Game Management Area	IG3	D	1991	50		Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	2	3,860	30.1E	12.4S
Kafue National Park	AS2	B	1991	5,927	3,008	Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	1	22,400	25.9E	15.2S
Kasanka National Park	IG3	D	1991	50		Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	3	390	30.2E	12.6S
Kotakota Game Management Area	AT3	A	1991	19	0	Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	5	17	28.0E	16.8S
Lavushi Manda National Park	IG3	D	1991	15		Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	3	1,500	30.8E	12.4S
Lower Zambezi National Park	AS2	B	1991	328	242	Chanda & Tembo, 1993	2	4,092	29.7E	15.5S
Luambe National Park	AS2	B	1994	54	90	Jachmann & Kalyocha, 1994	3	320	32.2E	12.6S
Luano Game Management Area	IG3	D	1991	40		Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	2	8,930	29.6E	14.8S
Lukusuzi National Park	AS2	B	1994	110	194	Jachmann & Kalyocha, 1994	3	1,920	32.6E	12.8S
Lumimba Game Management Area	AS3	B	1994	299	328	Jachmann & Kalyocha, 1994	2	2,700	32.4E	12.5S
Lunga-Luswishi Game Management Area	AS3	B	1991	125	226	Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	2	13,340	26.9E	13.8S
Lupande Game Management Area	AS3	B	1993	666	116	Jachmann, 1995	2	4,840	32.0E	13.3S
Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park	AT3	A	1991	19	0	Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	4	66	25.8E	17.9S
Mumbwa Game Management Area	AS2	B	1991	2,538	3,048	Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	2	3,370	26.4E	15.1S
Munyamadzi Game management Area	AS3	B	1994	459	340	Jachmann & Kalyocha, 1994	3	2,500	31.8E	12.4S
Musalangu Game Management Area	AS2	B	1991	624	546	Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	2	17,350	32.8E	11.2S
North Luangwa National park	AS3	B	1993	2,100	366	Jachmann, Quest. Reply, 1994	2	4,636	32.2E	11.9S
Nsumbu National Park	AS2	B	1991	88	128	Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	2	2,020	30.2E	8.8S
Sandwe Game Management Area	AS2	B	1994	131	190	Jachmann & Kalyocha, 1994	3	1,500	31.3E	13.8S
Sekula Game Management Area ns	AT3	A	1991	7	0	Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	1
Sichifula/Mulobezi Game Management Area	AS2	B	1991	1,673	2,116	Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	2	7,383	25.7E	16.8S
Sioma Ngwezi National Park	AS2	B	1991	1,187	962	Tembo, 1995	2	5,276	23.4E	17.3S
South Luangwa National Park	AS2	B	1994	7,197	2,402	Jachmann & Kalyocha, 1994	2	9,050	31.5E	13.1S
West Lunga National Park	AS2	B	1991	322	584	Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993	3	1,684	24.8E	12.8S
West Petauke Game Management Area	AS3	B	1994	1,850	3,386	Jachmann & Kalyocha, 1994	2	3,842	30.3E	14.3S

* Range of informed guess

¹Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change

²Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.

³PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.