Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 51 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Aerial or Ground Sample Counts | 500 | 250 | 250 | 0 |
Informed Guesses, Undocumented Aerial or Dung Surveys and GIS Extrapolations | 0 | 0 | 560 | 0 |
Other Guesses and Other Extrapolations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 585 |
Total | 551 | 250 | 810 | 585 |
No changes between current and previous report.
Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Abo Koamekro National Park | GT1 | A | 1994 | 6 | Kouame, Quest. Reply, 1994 | 3 | 151 | 5.1W | 6.9N | |
Azagny National Park | AS3 | D | 1987 | 60 | Lauginie, in Douglas-Hamilton et al, 1992 | 3 | 231 | 4.8W | 5.2N | |
Bolo Forest | OG3 | E | 8889 | 5 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 3 | 88 | 5.8W | 5.2N | |
Bossematie Forest Reserve and Area | GT1 | A | 1993 | 45 | Waitkuwait, Quest. Reply, 1994; Lauginie, Quest. Reply | 3 | 220 | 3.5W | 6.6N | |
Comoe National Park | AS3 | B | 1989 | 750 | 250 | Lauginie, in Douglas-Hamilton et al, 1992 | 1 | 19,337 | 3.7W | 9.1N |
Davo Forest | OG3 | E | 8889 | 20 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 3 | 126 | 6.1W | 5.8N | |
Djambamakrou Forest | OG3 | E | 8889 | 30 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 3 | 389 | 3.2W | 6.4N | |
Duekoue Forest | OG3 | E | 8889 | 15 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 536 | 7.1W | 6.7N | |
Fresco Forest Area | IG3 | D | 1991 | 150 | Alers, in Douglas-Hamilton et al, 1992 | 2 | 2,229 | 5.8W | 5.1N | |
Go-Bodienou Forest | OG3 | E | 8889 | 20 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 600 | 5.0W | 5.4N | |
Goin-Cavally and Goin-Debe Forest Reserve | OG3 | E | 8889 | 70 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 1,890 | 7.8W | 6.2N | |
Haut Sassandra Forest Reserve | OG3 | E | 8889 | 50 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 1,187 | 7.0W | 7.2N | |
Keregbo Forest | OG3 | E | 8889 | 30 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 3 | 213 | 3.8W | 7.5N | |
Marahoue National Park | IG3 | D | 1991 | 50 | Alers, in Douglas-Hamilton et al, 1992 | 2 | 1,038 | 6.0W | 7.1N | |
Mont Peko National Park | OG3 | E | 8889 | 20 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 3 | 340 | 7.2W | 7.1N | |
Niegre Forest Reserve | OG3 | E | 8889 | 50 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 1,056 | 6.2W | 5.4N | |
Okromodou Forest | OG3 | E | 8889 | 50 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 945 | 5.6W | 5.3N | |
Sangbe National Park | OG3 | E | 8889 | 30 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 950 | 7.3W | 8.0N | |
Scio Forest Reserve | OG3 | E | 8889 | 30 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 1,338 | 7.8W | 6.8N | |
Songan, Tamin, Mabi and Yaya Forest Reserve | OG3 | E | 8889 | 150 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 1,647 | 3.4W | 5.9N | |
Tai National Park and Ecosystem | IG3 | D | 1991 | 300 | Alers, in Douglas-Hamilton et al, 1992 | 1 | 8,119 | 7.1W | 5.6N | |
Tene Forest | OG3 | E | 8889 | 5 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 5 | 4 | 5.4W | 6.5N | |
Tiapleu Forest | OG3 | E | 8889 | 10 | Merz & Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 3 | 380 | 8.3W | 7.5N |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.