Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Informed Guesses | 52 | 0 | 360 | 25 |
Other Guesses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 641 |
Total | 63 | 0 | 360 | 666 |
No changes between current and previous report.
Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Abokoamekro Faunal Reserve | GT1 | A | 2000 | 11 | Kobon, quest. reply, 2002 | 3 | 135 | 5.1W | 6.9N | |
Azagny National Park | AS3 | E | 1987 | 60 | Lauginie in Douglas-Hamilton et al., 1992 | 3 | 190 | 4.9W | 5.2N | |
Beki-Bossematie Classified Forest | IG3 | D | 1993 | 35 | Theuerkauf et al., 2001 | 3 | 389 | 3.5W | 6.6N | |
Bolo Forest | OG3 | E | 1989 | 5 | Merz and Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 3 | 88 | 5.8W | 5.2N | |
Comoé National Park | IG3 | D | 1998 | 200 | Fischer pers. comm., 1998 | 1 | 11,500 | 3.7W | 9.1N | |
Davo Forest | OG3 | E | 1989 | 20 | Merz and Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 3 | 126 | 6.1W | 5.8N | |
Djambamakrou Forest | OG3 | E | 1989 | 30 | Merz and Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 3 | 274 | 3.2W | 6.4N | |
Duekoué Forest | OG3 | E | 1997 | 6 | Kobon, quest. reply, 2002 | 2 | 536 | 7.1W | 6.7N | |
Fresco Forest | IG3 | E | 1991 | 150 | Alers in Douglas-Hamilton et al., 1992 | 2 | 2,229 | 5.8W | 5.1N | |
Go-Bodienou Forest | OG3 | E | 1989 | 20 | Merz and Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 600 | 5.0W | 5.4N | |
Goin-Cavally Classified Forest | OG3 | E | 1989 | 70 | Merz and Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 1,890 | 7.8W | 6.2N | |
Haut Bandama Fauna and Flora Reserve | OG3 | E | 1996 | 20 | Bouché, 2002 | 2 | 1,300 | 5.7W | 8.5N | |
Haut Sassandra Classified Forest | IG3 | D | 1997 | 30 | Kobon, quest. reply, 2002 | 2 | 1,024 | 7.0W | 7.2N | |
Keregbo Forest | OG3 | E | 1989 | 30 | Merz and Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 3 | 213 | 3.8W | 7.5N | |
Marahoué National Park | IG3 | E | 1991 | 50 | Alers in Douglas-Hamilton et al., 1992 | 2 | 1,010 | 6.0W | 7.1N | |
Mont Péko National Park | OG3 | E | 2000 | 40 | Kobon, quest. reply, 2002 | 3 | 340 | 7.3W | 7.0N | |
Mont Sangbé National Park | IG3 | D | 2001 | 47 | Lauginie et al. 2001 | 2 | 950 | 7.3W | 8.0N | |
Niegré Classified Forest | OG3 | E | 1989 | 50 | Merz and Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 1,056 | 6.2W | 5.4N | |
Okromodou Forest | OG3 | E | 1989 | 50 | Merz and Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 945 | 5.6W | 5.3N | |
Scio Classified Forest | OG3 | E | 1989 | 30 | Merz and Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 2 | 1,338 | 7.8W | 6.8N | |
Songan-Tamin-Mabi-Yaya Classified Forest | IG3 | D | 1993 | 20 | Theuerkauf et al., 2001 | 2 | 1,698 | 3.4W | 5.9N | |
Taï Ecosystem | IG3 | D | 2001 | 75 | 25* | Hoppe-Dominik pers. comm., 2003 | 1 | 6,410 | 7.1W | 5.6N |
Tené Forest | IG3 | D | 1998 | 5 | Kobon, quest. reply, 2002 | 5 | 4 | 5.4W | 6.5N | |
Tiapleu Forest | OG3 | E | 1989 | 10 | Merz and Hoppe-Dominik, 1991 | 3 | 380 | 8.3W | 7.5N |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.