Elephant Database
African Elephant Specialist Group

Burkina Faso, 1998

All Years for Burkina Faso: 201620132007200219981995

1998 Summary Totals for Burkina Faso

Data Category Definite Probable Possible Speculative
Aerial or Ground Sample Counts1,6166066060
Informed Guesses008800

No changes between current and previous report.

Burkina Faso : Elephant Estimates

Survey Details2 Number of Elephants Area Map Location
Input ZoneTypeReliab.YearEstimate95% C.L. SourcePFS3 (km²) Lon. Lat.
Arly National ParkAS2B1998419 346Barry & Chardonnet, 19982930 1.4E 11.5N
Bontioli Partial and Total Faunal ReserveIG3D199850Chardonnet, Quest. Reply, 19982420 3.1W 10.8N
Deux Bale and Dibon Classified ForestIG3D1998200Chardonnet, Quest. Reply, 19982838 2.9W 11.6N
KonkombouriAS2B1998219 192Barry & Chardonnet, 19982650 1.2E 11.4N
Maro and Tui Classified ForestIG3D199880Chardonnet, Quest. Reply, 19982930 3.6W 11.7N
Nazinga Game RanchGS3B1998489 86Nganga, (in prep.)2940 1.4W 11.1N
OugarouIG3D1998100Chardonnet, Quest. Reply, 19982644 1.1E 11.9N
Pagou-TandougouAS2B1998391 171Barry & Chardonnet, 19982300 1.4E 11.7N
Pama Centre SudAS2B1998270 162Barry & Chardonnet, 19982517 .9E 11.3N
Remainder of PamaIG3D1998200Chardonnet, Quest. Reply, 199822,237 1.0E 11.1N
Singou Partial Faunal ReserveAS2B1998434 385Barry & Chardonnet, 199821,518 1.0E 11.7N
W and KourtiagouIG3D1998100Chardonnet, Quest. Reply, 199812,878 2.1E 11.8N
ZabréIG3D1998150Chardonnet, Quest. Reply, 19982600 .6W 11.1N

* Range of informed guess

1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change

2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.

3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.

IUCNSpecies Survival Commission

All materials on this site are Copyright (C) 1995-2022 IUCN - The International Union for the Conservation of Nature. Use is permitted only under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0).