Rwanda, 1995

All Years for Rwanda: 2016 — 2013 — 2007 — 2002 — 1998 — 1995

1995 Summary Totals for Rwanda

Data Category	Definite	Possible	Speculative
Aerial or Ground Total Counts	39	0	0
Informed Guesses, Undocumented Aerial or Dung Surveys and GIS Extrapolations	0	32	10
Total	39	32	10

No changes between current and previous report.

Rwanda : Elephant Estimates

	Survey Details²			Number of Elephants				Area	Map Location
Input Zone	Type	Reliab.	Year	Estimate	95% C.L.	Source	PFS³	(km²)	Lon.	Lat.
Akagera National Park	AT3	A	1994	39	0	Fourniret, 1994	1	2,800	30.6E	1.6S
Nyungwe Forest Reserve	IG3	D		12		ORTPN, 1991	1	1,088	29.3E	2.5S
Volcans National Park	IG3	D	8889	20	10*	ORTPN, 1991	1	228	29.5E	1.5S

* Range of informed guess

¹Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change

²Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.

³PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.