|Aerial or Ground Total Counts||449||0||0||0|
|Aerial or Ground Sample Counts||198||1,569||1,569||0|
No changes between current and previous report.
|Survey Details2||Number of Elephants||Area||Map Location|
|Input Zone||Type||Reliab.||Year||Estimate||95% C.L.||Source||PFS3||(km²)||Lon.||Lat.|
|Kasungu National Park||AS2||B||1995||391||349||Bhima, 1996||1||2,316||33.1E||12.9S|
|Liwonde National Park||AT3||A||1995||414||Bhima, 1996||2||538||35.3E||14.9S|
|Nkhota-Kota Wildlife Reserve||AS2||B||1995||1,037||1,511||JICA/GOM, 1997||1||1,802||34.0E||12.9S|
|Nyika National Park||AS1||B||1997||339||239||AHT International, 1997||1||3,134||33.8E||10.6S|
|Phirilongwe Forest Reserve||IG3||D||1998||50||Munthali, pers. comm., 1998||2||640||35.0E||14.6S|
|Thuma Forest Reserve||IG3||D||1998||30||20*||Munthali, pers. comm., 1998||2||370||34.2E||13.9S|
|Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve||AT3||A||1997||35||AHT International, 1997||2||986||33.4E||11.0S|
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.