Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 74 | 323 | 323 | 0 |
Informed Guesses | 111 | 0 | 309 | 20 |
Other Guesses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,567 |
Totals 2006 | 185 | 323 | 632 | 1,587 |
Cause of Change | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Repeat Survey | -18 | -308 | -94 | 0 |
New Population | +75 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
New Guess | -439 | 0 | +165 | +530 |
Data Degraded | -80 | -938 | -1,087 | +1,037 |
Totals | -462 | -1,246 | -1,017 | +1,567 |
Data Category | Known Range | Possible Range | Total Range |
---|---|---|---|
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 2,908 | 0 | 2,908 |
Informed Guesses | 1,511 | 0 | 1,511 |
Other Guesses | 2,316 | 0 | 2,316 |
Unassessed Range | 0 | 804 | 804 |
Totals | 6,735 | 804 | 7,538 |
Cause of | Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Change1 | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Kasungu National Park | RS | AS1 | B | 2005 | 58 | 218 | Ferreira et al., 2005 | 1 | 2,463 | 33.1E | 12.9S |
Liwonde National Park | NG | OG3 | E | 2006 | 530 | African Parks Foundation, 2006b | 2 | 538 | 35.3E | 14.9S | |
Majete Wildlife Reserve | NP | IG3 | D | 2006 | 70 | African Parks Foundation, 2006b | 3 | 140 | 34.7E | 16.0S | |
Nkhota-Kota Wildlife Reserve | DD | AS2 | E | 1995 | 1,037 | 1,511 | JICA & Government of Malawi, 1997 | 1 | 1,802 | 34.0E | 12.9S |
Nyika National Park | - | AS1 | B | 1997 | 339 | 239 | Gibson, 1997 | 1 | 3,134 | 33.8E | 10.6S |
Phirilongwe Forest Reserve | - | IG3 | D | 1998 | 50 | S.M. Munthali, pers. comm., 1998 | 2 | 640 | 35.0E | 14.6S | |
Thuma Forest Reserve | - | IG3 | D | 1998 | 30 | 20* | S.M. Munthali, pers. comm., 1998 | 2 | 370 | 34.2E | 13.9S |
Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve | NG | IG3 | D | 2005 | 270 | Ferreira et al., 2005 | 1 | 976 | 33.4E | 11.0S |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.