Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Sample Counts | 371 | 218 | 218 | 0 |
Informed Guesses | 105 | 0 | 967 | 443 |
Total | 476 | 218 | 1,185 | 443 |
No changes between current and previous report.
Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Bia National Park and Resource Reserve | IG3 | D | 1994 | 100 | Sam, pers. comm., 1995 | 3 | 306 | 3.1W | 6.5N | |
Chichibon Corridor | IG3 | D | 1994 | 12 | 3* | Sam & Wilson, 1994 | 3 | 290 | .8W | 7.2N |
Digya National Park | IG3 | D | 1994 | 200 | Sam, 1994a | 2 | 3,478 | .3W | 7.4N | |
Kakum and Assin-Attandanso | IG3 | D | 1990 | 100 | Dudley, et al., 1992 | 3 | 347 | 1.3W | 5.5N | |
Mole National Park | AS3 | B | 1993 | 589 | 218 | Grainger, pers. comm., 1994 | 1 | 4,840 | 1.9W | 9.6N |
Nini-Suhien and Ankasa | IG3 | D | 1994 | 60 | 90* | Sam, pers. comm., 1995 | 2 | 509 | 2.6W | 5.3N |
Northeastern Ghana | IG3 | D | 1996 | 100 | 50* | Sam, 1994b | 2 | 1,370 | .5W | 10.7N |
Western Ghana | IG3 | D | 1994 | 500 | 300* | Sam, pers. comm., 1995 | 2 | 2,035 | 2.7W | 6.9N |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.