Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 401 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 388 | 179 | 179 | 0 |
Other Dung Counts | 0 | 208 | 55 | 0 |
Informed Guesses | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
Other Guesses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Totals 2006 | 789 | 387 | 241 | 12 |
Cause of Change | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
New Population | 0 | 0 | +7 | 0 |
Different Technique | +259 | -41 | -854 | -300 |
Data Degraded | 0 | 0 | -11 | +9 |
Totals | +259 | -41 | -859 | -291 |
Data Category | Known Range | Possible Range | Total Range |
---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 2,628 | 1,710 | 4,338 |
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 2,348 | 0 | 2,348 |
Other Dung Counts | 2,704 | 24 | 2,728 |
Informed Guesses | 140 | 0 | 140 |
Other Guesses | 320 | 0 | 320 |
Unassessed Range | 4,720 | 8,707 | 13,426 |
Totals | 12,860 | 10,441 | 23,301 |
Cause of | Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Change1 | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Ankasa Conservation Area | - | DC3 | C | 2001 | 21 | 15 | Danquah et al., 2001 | 2 | 509 | 2.6W | 5.3N |
Bia National Park & Resource Reserve | DT | DC2 | C | 2004 | 115 | 29 | Sam et al., 2006 | 3 | 306 | 3.1W | 6.5N |
Chichibon Corridor | DD | IG3 | E | 1994 | 12 | 3* | Sam & Wilson, 1994 | 2 | 290 | .7W | 7.3N |
Dadieso Forest Reserve | NP | IG3 | D | 2002 | 7 | Ayesu, 2003 | 3 | 195 | 3.0W | 6.0N | |
Digya National Park | DT | DC1 | B | 2006 | 357 | 54 | Kumordzi & Danquah, 2006 | 2 | 3,478 | .3W | 7.4N |
Goaso Forest Reserves Complex | DT | DC3 | C | 2004 | 72 | 44 | Sam, 2004 | 2 | 2,035 | 2.7W | 6.8N |
Kakum Conservation Area | DT | DC1 | B | 2004 | 164 | 36 | Danquah, 2004 | 3 | 366 | 1.3W | 5.5N |
Mole National Park | DT | AT2 | A | 2006 | 401 | Bouché, 2006 | 2 | 4,504 | 1.9W | 9.6N | |
Red & White Volta - Morago Ecosystem | - | DC3 | B | 1998 | 46 | 167 | Sam, 1998 | 2 | 1,370 | .5W | 10.7N |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.