Togo, 1998

All Years for Togo: 2016 — 2013 — 2007 — 2002 — 1998 — 1995

1998 Summary Totals for Togo

Data Category	Definite	Probable	Possible	Speculative
Informed Guesses	0	0	96	0
Total	0	0	96	0

No changes between current and previous report.

Togo : Elephant Estimates

	Survey Details²			Number of Elephants				Area	Map Location
Input Zone	Type	Reliab.	Year	Estimate	95% C.L.	Source	PFS³	(km²)	Lon.	Lat.
Doung-Pana	IG3	D	1995	15		DPNRFC, 1995	2	210	.0W	10.7N
Fazao-Malfakassa National Park	IG3	D	1995	30		DPNRFC, 1995	1	1,920	.8E	8.7N
Kéran National Park	IG3	D	1998	16		Okoumassou, Quest. Reply, 1998	1	1,636	.7E	10.1N
Oti-Mandouri Faunal Reserve	IG3	D	1995	35		DPNRFC, 1995	1	1,478	.7E	10.6N

* Range of informed guess

¹Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change

²Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.

³PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.