Togo, 2007

All Years for Togo: 2016 — 2013 — 2007 — 2002 — 1998 — 1995

2007 Summary Totals for Togo

Data Category	Definite	Possible
Aerial or Ground Total Counts	0	0
Informed Guesses	4	61
Totals 2006	4	61

Interpretation of Changes in Estimates from Previous Report

Cause of Change	Definite	Probable	Possible	Speculative
Different Technique	0	0	-51	0
Totals	0	0	-51	0

Area of Range Covered by Each Data Category (km²)

Data Category	Known Range	Possible Range	Total Range
Aerial or Ground Total Counts	1,412	0	1,412
Informed Guesses	2,319	0	2,319
Unassessed Range	1,375	339	1,714
Totals	5,105	339	5,444

Togo : Elephant Estimates

	Cause of	Survey Details²			Number of Elephants				Area	Map Location
Input Zone	Change¹	Type	Reliab.	Year	Estimate	95% C.L.	Source	PFS³	(km²)	Lon.	Lat.
Abdoulayé Faunal Reserve	-	IG3	D	2002	4		Okoumassou, quest. reply, 2002	2	300	1.3E	8.7N
Fazao-Malfakassa National Park	-	IG3	D	2002	61		Okoumassou, quest. reply, 2002	1	1,920	.8E	8.7N
Fosse aux Lions National Park	-	IG3	D	2002	0		Okoumassou, quest. reply, 2002	1	17	.2E	10.8N
Kéran National Park	DT	AT2	A	2003	0		Bouché et al., 2004b	1	1,402	.7E	10.1N
Oti-Mandori Faunal Reserve	DT	AT2	A	2003	0		Bouché et al., 2004b	1	1,484	.7E	10.6N

* Range of informed guess

¹Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change

²Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.

³PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.