Central African Republic, 1995

All Years for Central African Republic: 2016 — 2013 — 2007 — 2002 — 1998 — 1995

1995 Summary Totals for Central African Republic

Data Category	Definite	Possible	Speculative
Aerial or Ground Total Counts	1,750	0	0
Informed Guesses, Undocumented Aerial or Dung Surveys and GIS Extrapolations	0	2,640	0
Other Guesses and Other Extrapolations	0	0	4,894
Total	1,750	2,640	4,894

No changes between current and previous report.

Central African Republic : Elephant Estimates

	Survey Details²			Number of Elephants				Area	Map Location
Input Zone	Type	Reliab.	Year	Estimate	95% C.L.	Source	PFS³	(km²)	Lon.	Lat.
Bamingui-Bangoran Complex	AS3	E	1985	1,607	1,896	Douglas-Hamilton et al., 1985	2	32,000	20.0E	7.7N
Bangassou Forest	DC3	D	1989	2,640		Fay & Agnagna, 1991a; Fay, 1991	2	5,550	23.3E	5.2N
Dzanga-Sangha Reserve	IR1	A	1993	1,750		Turkalo, Quest. Reply, 1993; Turkalo & Fay, 1995	2	3,293	16.2E	3.0N
Manovo-Gounda-Saint Floris Complex	AS3	E	1985	2,701	1,837	Douglas-Hamilton et al., 1985	2	32,400	21.6E	9.2N
Manovo Intensive	AS2	E	1985	444	319	Douglas-Hamilton et al., 1985	2	4,800	21.2E	8.7N
Rhino Sector	AS2	E	1985	51	48	Douglas-Hamilton et al., 1985	3	2,700	20.9E	7.4N
Vassako-Bolo	AS2	E	1985	91	120	Douglas-Hamilton et al., 1985	3	2,500	19.8E	8.0N

* Range of informed guess

¹Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change

²Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.

³PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.