Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 392 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Aerial or Ground Sample Counts | 15,481 | 6,179 | 6,179 | 0 |
Informed Guesses | 0 | 0 | 785 | 0 |
Total | 15,873 | 6,179 | 6,964 | 0 |
No changes between current and previous report.
Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Chiawa Game Management Area | AS2 | B | 1996 | 48 | 102 | Phiri, 1996 | 3 | 900 | 28.9E | 15.8S |
Isangano National Park | GT1 | A | 1993 | 3 | Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993 | 3 | 840 | 30.6E | 11.2S | |
Kafinda Game Management Area | IG3 | D | 1991 | 50 | Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993 | 2 | 3,860 | 30.1E | 12.4S | |
Kafue National Park | AS2 | B | 1997 | 4,482 | 3,222 | Zyambo, 1997 | 1 | 22,400 | 25.9E | 15.2S |
Kasanka National Park | IG3 | D | 1991 | 50 | Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993 | 3 | 390 | 30.2E | 12.6S | |
Katokota Game Ranch | AT3 | A | 1991 | 19 | Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993 | 5 | 15 | 28.0E | 16.8S | |
Lavushi Manda National Park | IG3 | D | 1991 | 15 | Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993 | 3 | 1,500 | 30.8E | 12.4S | |
Lower Zambezi National Park | AS2 | B | 1996 | 232 | 457 | Phiri, 1996 | 2 | 4,092 | 29.7E | 15.5S |
Luano Game Management Area | IG3 | D | 1996 | 150 | Jachmann, 1996 | 2 | 8,930 | 29.6E | 14.8S | |
Lukusuzi National Park | AS2 | B | 1994 | 110 | 190 | Jachmann & Kalyocha, 1994 | 2 | 2,720 | 32.6E | 12.8S |
Lumimba Game Management Area | AS3 | B | 1996 | 763 | 811 | Jachmann, 1996 | 2 | 4,500 | 32.4E | 12.5S |
Lupande Game Management Area | AS2 | B | 1996 | 892 | 1,394 | Jachmann, 1996 | 2 | 4,840 | 32.0E | 13.3S |
Mosi-oa-Tunya National Park | AT3 | A | 1991 | 19 | Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993 | 4 | 66 | 25.8E | 17.9S | |
Mumbwa Game Management Area | AS2 | B | 1997 | 124 | 229 | Zyambo, 1997 | 2 | 3,370 | 26.4E | 15.1S |
Munyamadzi Game Management Area | AS2 | B | 1996 | 102 | 210 | Jachmann, 1996 | 2 | 3,300 | 31.8E | 12.4S |
Musalangu Game Management Area | AS3 | B | 1996 | 305 | 690 | Jachmann, 1996 | 2 | 17,350 | 32.8E | 11.2S |
Nchete Island Wildlife Sanctuary | AT3 | A | 1991 | 49 | Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993 | 5 | 25 | 27.6E | 17.4S | |
North Luangwa National Park | AS3 | B | 1996 | 3,033 | 2,252 | Jachmann, 1996 | 2 | 4,636 | 32.2E | 11.9S |
Nsumbu National Park | IR1 | A | 1998 | 45 | Saiwana, pers. comm., 1998 | 2 | 2,063 | 30.4E | 8.8S | |
Sandwe Game Management Area | AS2 | B | 1996 | 818 | 1,597 | Jachmann, 1996 | 3 | 1,530 | 31.3E | 13.8S |
Sekula Island Wildlife Sanctuary | AT3 | A | 1991 | 7 | Tembo, Quest. Reply, 1993 | 5 | 10 | 27.5E | 17.4S | |
Sichifula Game Management Area | AS2 | B | 1997 | 374 | 686 | Zyambo, 1997 | 2 | 3,600 | 25.7E | 16.8S |
Sioma Ngwezi National Park | AT3 | A | 1996 | 250 | Mwiya, 1996 | 2 | 5,276 | 23.4E | 17.3S | |
South Luangwa National Park | AS2 | B | 1996 | 7,942 | 2,930 | Jachmann, 1996 | 2 | 9,050 | 31.6E | 13.1S |
West Lunga National Park | AS3 | D | 1996 | 520 | Phiri, pers. comm., 1998 | 3 | 1,684 | 24.8E | 12.8S | |
West Petauke Game Management Area | AS3 | B | 1996 | 2,435 | 2,773 | Jachmann, 1996 | 2 | 4,140 | 30.3E | 14.3S |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.