Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 7,750 | 1,872 | 1,872 | 0 |
Total | 7,769 | 1,872 | 1,872 | 0 |
No changes between current and previous report.
Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Caprivi Region | AS2 | B | 1998 | 4,576 | 1,223 | Ministry of the Environment and Tourism Namibia, 1998 | 1 | 18,259 | 23.3E | 17.9S |
Etosha National Park | AS1 | B | 2002 | 2,417 | 663 | Kilian, 2003 | 1 | 18,464 | 15.9E | 19.0S |
Kavango Region | AT3 | A | 1995 | 19 | Lindeque et al., 1995 | 3 | 762 | 18.5E | 18.4S | |
Khaudom/Nyae-Nyae | AS2 | B | 2000 | 1,966 | 973 | Craig pers. comm., 2003a | 2 | 12,107 | 20.5E | 19.2S |
Kunene | AS3 | B | 2000 | 663 | 790 | Craig pers. comm., 2003a | 1 | 86,451 | 13.5E | 19.0S |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.