Namibia, 1995

All Years for Namibia: 2016 — 2013 — 2007 — 2002 — 1998 — 1995

1995 Summary Totals for Namibia

Data Category	Definite	Probable	Possible
Aerial or Ground Total Counts	366	0	0
Aerial or Ground Sample Counts	5,477	3,058	3,058
Total	5,843	3,058	3,058

No changes between current and previous report.

Namibia : Elephant Estimates

	Survey Details²			Number of Elephants				Area	Map Location
Input Zone	Type	Reliab.	Year	Estimate	95% C.L.	Source	PFS³	(km²)	Lon.	Lat.
Caprivi Region	AS1	B	1993	5,785	3,046	Rodwell, 1993	2	7,027	23.5E	17.9S
Etosha National Park	AS1	B	1990	1,750	250	Lindeque & Lindeque, 1990	1	21,347	15.9E	19.0S
Kaokoveld Area	AT3	A	1992	366	0	Loutit & Douglas-Hamilton, 1992	1	21,282	13.9E	19.8S
Khaudom Area	AS1	B	1990	1,000	100	Lindeque & Lindeque, 1990	1	12,492	20.7E	19.5S

* Range of informed guess

¹Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change

²Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.

³PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.