Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 135 | 79 | 79 | 0 |
Other Guesses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57 |
Totals 2006 | 135 | 79 | 79 | 57 |
Cause of Change | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Different Technique | +135 | +79 | -29 | 0 |
Population Lost | 0 | 0 | 0 | -83 |
Totals | +135 | +79 | -29 | -83 |
Data Category | Known Range | Possible Range | Total Range |
---|---|---|---|
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 491 | 0 | 491 |
Other Guesses | 0 | 691 | 691 |
Unassessed Range | 342 | 0 | 342 |
Totals | 833 | 691 | 1,524 |
Cause of | Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Change1 | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Ouré Kaba | - | OG3 | E | 1998 | 57 | Sagnah, quest. reply, 1998 | 1 | 691 | 11.7W | 10.1N | |
Sansalé | PL | OG3 | E | 1998 | 0 | Sagnah, quest. reply, 1998 | 1 | 1,014 | 13.7W | 11.7N | |
Ziama Strict Nature Reserve | DT | DC2 | B | 2004 | 214 | 79 | Barnes & Nandjui, 2005 | 1 | 455 | 9.2W | 8.2N |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.