Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 348 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Informed Guesses | 0 | 0 | 105 | 100 |
Other Guesses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 275 |
Totals 2006 | 348 | 0 | 105 | 375 |
Cause of Change | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Repeat Survey | +20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Different Technique | -150 | 0 | 0 | -100 |
Data Degraded | 0 | 0 | -235 | +175 |
Totals | -130 | 0 | -235 | +75 |
Data Category | Known Range | Possible Range | Total Range |
---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 495 | 1,570 | 2,065 |
Informed Guesses | 1,801 | 653 | 2,454 |
Other Guesses | 3,821 | 142 | 3,964 |
Unassessed Range | 7,030 | 7,456 | 14,486 |
Totals | 13,147 | 9,821 | 22,968 |
Cause of | Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Change1 | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Andoni Island | - | IG3 | D | 2002 | 6 | 4* | Mshelbwala et al., 2002 | 3 | 215 | 7.5E | 4.5N |
Chad Basin (Chingurmi-Duguma) National Park Sector | DD | IG3 | E | 1994 | 100 | Mshelbwala, 1998 | 2 | 2,160 | 14.4E | 11.7N | |
Cross River (Okwangwo) National Park | - | DC3 | D | 1998 | 74 | 56* | Obot et al., 1998 | 2 | 239 | 9.2E | 6.3N |
Gashaka-Gumti National Park | - | IG3 | D | 2002 | 20 | 30* | R. Barnwell, pers. comm., 2002 | 1 | 5,860 | 11.7E | 7.5N |
Kambari | - | IG3 | D | 1998 | 5 | 10* | Gawaisa, quest. reply, 1998 | 2 | 2,000 | 10.6E | 8.8N |
Kwiambana Game Reserve | DD | IG3 | E | 1993 | 80 | 40* | Hurst, quest. reply, 1994 | 2 | 1,715 | 6.6E | 11.3N |
Marguba Forest Reserve | DT | AT3 | A | 2006 | 0 | Omondi et al., 2006a | 1 | 710 | 12.7E | 11.5N | |
Okomu Game Sanctuary | - | OG3 | E | 1991 | 40 | NRCC, 1991 | 2 | 1,082 | 5.1E | 6.3N | |
Omo Forest Reserve | DD | IG3 | E | 1994 | 30 | 20* | Mshelbwala, 1998 | 2 | 1,300 | 3.6E | 6.8N |
Sambisa | DT | AT3 | A | 2006 | 0 | Omondi et al., 2006a | 1 | 647 | 13.4E | 11.3N | |
Taylor Creek | DD | IG3 | E | 1993 | 25 | Thouless, 1993 | 3 | 145 | 6.4E | 5.2N | |
Yankari National Park | RS | AT3 | A | 2006 | 348 | Omondi et al., 2006b | 2 | 3,224 | 10.5E | 9.8N |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.