|Aerial or Ground Total Counts||12||0||0||0|
No changes between current and previous report.
|Survey Details2||Number of Elephants||Area||Map Location|
|Input Zone||Type||Reliab.||Year||Estimate||95% C.L.||Source||PFS3||(km²)||Lon.||Lat.|
|Babille Elephant Sanctuary||IG3||D||1998||65||135*||Tekle pers. comm., 1998||1||6,982||42.5E||8.7N|
|Chew Bahr Wildlife Reserve||IG3||D||2001||60||Chago et al., 2001||2||4,212||36.9E||4.9N|
|Dabus Valley Controlled Hunting Area||IG3||D||1998||200||Abdi pers. comm., 1998||2||2,127||35.1E||10.6N|
|Gambella National Park||IG3||D||2002||200||Ethiopia Wildlife Conservation Organization, 2002||2||5,061||33.9E||8.0N|
|Mago & Omo National Parks||IG3||D||2002||324||200*||Demeke, 2003||1||6,230||36.0E||5.8N|
|Mizan Teferi Controlled Hunting Area||IG3||D||1998||500||Abdi pers. comm., 1998||2||3,160||35.7E||7.4N|
|Tekezze Valley Wildlife Reserve||AT2||A||1996||6||Litoroh, 1997a||2||1,130||37.2E||14.2N|
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.