Ethiopia, 1995

All Years for Ethiopia: 2016 — 2013 — 2007 — 2002 — 1998 — 1995

1995 Summary Totals for Ethiopia

Data Category	Definite	Possible
Aerial or Ground Total Counts	657	0
Informed Guesses, Undocumented Aerial or Dung Surveys and GIS Extrapolations	190	1,560
Total	847	1,560

No changes between current and previous report.

Ethiopia : Elephant Estimates

	Survey Details²			Number of Elephants				Area	Map Location
Input Zone	Type	Reliab.	Year	Estimate	95% C.L.	Source	PFS³	(km²)	Lon.	Lat.
Akobo-Mizan Teferi Area	IG3	D	1990	1,000		Allen-Rowlandson, 1990	2	3,500	34.9E	7.2N
Ameya-Bonga Area	IG3	D	1990	200		Allen-Rowlandson, 1990	2	6,700	36.7E	7.0N
Babile Elephant Sanctuary	IG3	D	1990	100		Allen-Rowlandson, 1990	2	6,994	42.5E	8.7N
Borana Area NS	IG3	D	1990	50		Allen-Rowlandson, 1990	1
Gambella National Park	IG3	D	1990	100		Allen-Rowlandson, 1990	2	4,800	33.9E	8.1N
Mago and Omo National Park	AT3	A	1994	657	0	Lamprey, 1994	2	6,031	36.0E	5.8N
Metehel-Dabus River NS	IG3	D	1990	300		Allen-Rowlandson, 1990	2	6,994

* Range of informed guess

¹Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change

²Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.

³PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.