Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other Dung Counts | 0 | 726 | 295 | 0 |
Informed Guesses | 179 | 0 | 4,670 | 1,320 |
Other Guesses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8,197 |
Totals 2006 | 179 | 726 | 4,965 | 9,517 |
Cause of Change | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Repeat Survey | 0 | -368 | +219 | 0 |
New Population | 0 | 0 | +1,405 | +345 |
Different Technique | 0 | +178 | +147 | -157 |
New Guess | +175 | 0 | -2,212 | +1,025 |
Data Degraded | -2,002 | -2,142 | -3,610 | +5,144 |
Totals | -1,827 | -2,332 | -4,052 | +6,357 |
Data Category | Known Range | Possible Range | Total Range |
---|---|---|---|
Other Dung Counts | 1,503 | 0 | 1,503 |
Informed Guesses | 7,767 | 734 | 8,501 |
Other Guesses | 17,269 | 26,597 | 43,865 |
Unassessed Range | 31,842 | 32,860 | 64,702 |
Totals | 58,381 | 60,190 | 118,571 |
Cause of | Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Change1 | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Abong-Mbang Forest Reserve | - | OG3 | E | 1994 | 100 | A. Ekobo, pers. comm., 1994 | 2 | 1,540 | 13.1E | 4.2N | |
Bayang-Mbo Wildlife Sanctuary | RS | DC2 | D | 2001 | 457 | Bechem & Nchanji, 2001 | 3 | 662 | 9.6E | 5.3N | |
Benoué National Park | - | IG3 | E | 1991 | 540 | DFPN, 1991 | 2 | 1,800 | 13.8E | 8.3N | |
Bouba Ndjidah National Park | - | IG3 | E | 1991 | 660 | DFPN, 1991 | 2 | 2,200 | 14.7E | 8.6N | |
Boumba-Bek National Park | NG | IG3 | D | 2004 | 318 | Blake, 2005 | 2 | 2,383 | 15.0E | 2.7N | |
Campo (South) National Park | - | DC2 | C | 2001 | 548 | 255 | Bekhuis & Prins, 2003 | 3 | 648 | 10.1E | 2.3N |
Dja Faunal Reserve | DD | IG3 | E | 1995 | 1,500 | 500* | M.N. Tchamba, pers. comm., 1995 | 2 | 5,260 | 13.0E | 3.1N |
Faro National Park | - | IG3 | E | 1991 | 60 | Tchamba, 1993 | 2 | 3,300 | 12.7E | 8.2N | |
Korup National Park | DD | DC3 | E | 1993 | 425 | 271 | Powell, quest. reply, 1993 | 2 | 1,259 | 9.0E | 5.2N |
Lobéké National Park | DD | DC2 | E | 1993 | 3,719 | 2,125 | Ekobo, 1995 | 2 | 1,985 | 15.9E | 2.3N |
Ma'an Region | - | IG3 | D | 2000 | 4 | 10* | Matthews & Matthews, 2000 | 3 | 654 | 10.4E | 2.3N |
Mengame Wildlife Sanctuary | NP | IG3 | D | 2003 | 1,354 | 269 | Halford et al., 2003 | 2 | 1,425 | 12.3E | 2.3N |
Mongokele Forest Reserve | - | DC2 | E | 1991 | 773 | 53 | A. Ekobo, pers. comm., 1994 | 3 | 850 | 16.0E | 2.0N |
Mt. Cameroon | DT | DC3 | C | 2003 | 178 | 148 | Ekobo, 2003 | 3 | 676 | 9.2E | 4.2N |
Nki Forest Reserve | - | DC3 | D | 1998 | 2,178 | A. Ekobo, pers. comm., 1998 | 2 | 1,815 | 14.5E | 2.4N | |
Sudanian Area | - | IG3 | E | 1991 | 360 | DFPN, 1991 | 1 | 24,985 | 13.7E | 8.3N | |
Waza National Park | NG | IG3 | D | 2002 | 475 | 1025* | Saleh et al., 2002 | 2 | 1,700 | 14.7E | 11.3N |
Yabassi Area | NP | IG3 | D | 2002 | 63 | WWF Cameroon, 2003 | 2 | 2,425 | 10.3E | 4.5N | |
Yoko Area | NP | OG3 | E | 1999 | 60 | T. Sánchez Ariño, pers. comm., 2004 | 4 | 25 | 12.4E | 5.6N |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.