Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 11,539 | 2,786 | 2,786 | 0 |
Informed Guesses | 108 | 0 | 287 | 120 |
Other Guesses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6,782 |
Total | 11,647 | 2,786 | 3,073 | 6,902 |
No changes between current and previous report.
Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Banhine National Park | IG3 | D | 2002 | 8 | 2* | Anderson, quest. reply, 2002 | 2 | 7,000 | 32.9E | 22.8S |
Cabo Delgado Province | OG3 | E | 1998 | 2,450 | Direcçao Nacional de Florestas e Fauna Bravia, Mozambique, 1999 | 1 | 64,819 | 39.4E | 12.5S | |
Gilé National Reserve | IG3 | D | 2002 | 15 | 18* | Ntumi pers. comm., 2003 | 3 | 2,100 | 38.4E | 16.6S |
Inhambane Province | OG3 | E | 1998 | 260 | Direcçao Nacional de Florestas e Fauna Bravia, Mozambique, 1999 | 1 | 68,681 | 34.5E | 22.8S | |
Limpopo National Park | IG3 | D | 2002 | 150 | 50* | Anderson, quest. reply, 2002 | 2 | 10,000 | 31.9E | 23.3S |
Magoe North District | AS2 | B | 1995 | 0 | Mackie and Chafota, 1995 | 3 | 2,030 | 30.8E | 15.6S | |
Magoe South District | AS2 | B | 2001 | 1,264 | 1,359 | Mackie, 2001 | 3 | 2,824 | 30.7E | 15.9S |
Manica Province | OG3 | E | 1998 | 260 | Direcçao Nacional de Florestas e Fauna Bravia, Mozambique, 1999 | 1 | 62,694 | 33.4E | 19.0S | |
Maputo GR & Futi Corridor | IG3 | D | 2002 | 200 | 50* | Morley pers. comm., 2002 | 3 | 900 | 32.7E | 26.6S |
Mecuburi Forest Reserve | OG3 | E | 2002 | 5 | 5* | Anderson, quest. reply, 2002 | 4 | 195 | 39.0E | 14.3S |
Moribane-Chimanimani Forest Reserve | IG3 | D | 2002 | 22 | Ntumi pers. comm., 2003 | 4 | 185 | 33.4E | 19.5S | |
Niassa Game Reserve and Buffer Zone | AS2 | B | 2002 | 13,061 | 2,433 | Craig and Gibson, 2002 | 1 | 42,341 | 37.2E | 12.1S |
Quirimbas National Park | OG3 | E | 2000 | 90 | Motta pers. comm., 2002 | 2 | 7,845 | 40.0E | 12.5S | |
Sofala Province | OG3 | E | 1999 | 800 | 200* | Direcçao Nacional de Florestas e Fauna Bravia, Mozambique, 1999 | 1 | 66,385 | 34.7E | 19.1S |
Tete Province | OG3 | E | 1998 | 2,260 | 1650* | Direcçao Nacional de Florestas e Fauna Bravia, Mozambique, 1999 | 1 | 100,743 | 32.8E | 15.5S |
Zambezia Province | OG3 | E | 1998 | 657 | Direcçao Nacional de Florestas e Fauna Bravia, Mozambique, 1999 | 1 | 101,289 | 37.0E | 16.6S |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.