Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 630 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 13,427 | 2,396 | 2,396 | 0 |
Informed Guesses | 22 | 0 | 237 | 68 |
Other Guesses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6,912 |
Totals 2006 | 14,079 | 2,396 | 2,633 | 6,980 |
Cause of Change | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Repeat Survey | +428 | +749 | +1,032 | 0 |
Different Technique | +730 | 0 | +97 | -4 |
Different Area | +1,254 | -1,139 | -1,569 | 0 |
New Guess | +19 | 0 | 0 | +82 |
Totals | +2,432 | -390 | -440 | +78 |
Data Category | Known Range | Possible Range | Total Range |
---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 10,786 | 0 | 10,786 |
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 48,309 | 0 | 48,309 |
Informed Guesses | 4,831 | 2,592 | 7,423 |
Other Guesses | 123,197 | 66,794 | 189,991 |
Unassessed Range | 33,853 | 44,423 | 78,276 |
Totals | 220,977 | 113,809 | 334,786 |
Cause of | Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Change1 | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Banhine National Park | NG | IG3 | D | 2005 | 0 | Anderson, quest. reply, 2005 | 1 | 6,510 | 32.9E | 22.8S | |
Cabo Delgado Province | - | OG3 | E | 1998 | 670 | DNFFB, 1999 | 1 | 43,780 | 39.2E | 12.4S | |
Cabora Bassa North | DA | AS2 | B | 2003 | 1,718 | 807 | Dunham, 2004a | 3 | 3,708 | 30.7E | 15.4S |
Gilé Game Reserve | - | IG3 | D | 2002 | 15 | 18* | C.P. Ntumi, pers. comm., 2003 | 3 | 2,100 | 38.4E | 16.6S |
Gorongosa National Park | NG | IG3 | D | 2004 | 22 | Dunham, 2004b | 3 | 3,689 | 34.3E | 18.8S | |
Inhambane Province | - | OG3 | E | 1998 | 260 | DNFFB, 1999 | 3 | 2,235 | 34.0E | 22.7S | |
Limpopo National Park | DT | AT2 | A | 2006 | 630 | Whyte, 2006 | 2 | 10,000 | 31.9E | 23.3S | |
Magoe District | RS | AS2 | B | 2003 | 1,628 | 794 | Dunham, 2004a | 3 | 2,621 | 30.7E | 15.9S |
Manica Province | - | OG3 | E | 1998 | 260 | DNFFB, 1999 | 1 | 36,441 | 33.5E | 19.1S | |
Maputo GR & Futi Corridor | - | IG3 | D | 2002 | 200 | 50* | R. Morley, pers. comm., 2002 | 3 | 900 | 32.7E | 26.6S |
Mecuburi Forest Reserve | - | OG3 | E | 2002 | 5 | 5* | Anderson, quest. reply, 2002 | 4 | 195 | 39.0E | 14.3S |
Moribane-Chimanimani Forest Reserve | - | IG3 | D | 2002 | 22 | C.P. Ntumi, pers. comm., 2003 | 4 | 185 | 33.4E | 19.5S | |
Niassa Game Reserve & Buffer Zone | RS | AS2 | B | 2004 | 12,477 | 2,111 | Craig & Gibson, 2004 | 2 | 42,612 | 37.2E | 12.1S |
Quirimbas National Park | NG | OG3 | E | 2005 | 2,000 | Cumming & Jones, 2005 | 2 | 7,845 | 40.0E | 12.5S | |
Sofala Province | - | OG3 | E | 1999 | 800 | 200* | DNFFB, 1999 | 2 | 33,138 | 34.5E | 18.8S |
Tete Province | - | OG3 | E | 1998 | 2,260 | 1650* | DNFFB, 1999 | 1 | 63,581 | 32.5E | 15.5S |
Zambezia Province | - | OG3 | E | 1998 | 657 | DNFFB, 1999 | 1 | 101,289 | 35.9E | 17.8S |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.