Data Category | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 454 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 1,868 | 1,607 | 1,607 | 0 |
Other Dung Counts | 15 | 378 | 210 | 0 |
Informed Guesses | 0 | 0 | 120 | 0 |
Other Guesses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300 |
Totals 2006 | 2,337 | 1,985 | 1,937 | 300 |
Cause of Change | Definite | Probable | Possible | Speculative |
---|---|---|---|---|
New Population | 0 | 0 | +8 | +40 |
Different Technique | +273 | +1,985 | +1,719 | -200 |
Totals | +273 | +1,985 | +1,727 | -160 |
Data Category | Known Range | Possible Range | Total Range |
---|---|---|---|
Aerial or Ground Total Counts | 914 | 0 | 914 |
Direct Sample Counts and Reliable Dung Counts | 6,318 | 364 | 6,682 |
Other Dung Counts | 794 | 0 | 794 |
Informed Guesses | 1,138 | 0 | 1,138 |
Other Guesses | 1,634 | 0 | 1,634 |
Unassessed Range | 3,922 | 64 | 3,986 |
Totals | 14,720 | 428 | 15,148 |
Cause of | Survey Details2 | Number of Elephants | Area | Map Location | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Input Zone | Change1 | Type | Reliab. | Year | Estimate | 95% C.L. | Source | PFS3 | (km²) | Lon. | Lat. |
Bwindi Impenetrable Forest National Park | - | IG3 | D | 2002 | 30 | A. McNeilage, pers. comm., 2003 | 2 | 336 | 29.7E | 1.0S | |
Katonga Game Reserve | NP | OG3 | E | 2003 | 20 | 10* | M. Polanski, pers. comm., 2004 | 2 | 214 | 30.8E | 0.2N |
Kibale National Park | DT | DC3 | C | 2005 | 393 | 210 | Wanyama, 2005 | 2 | 795 | 30.4E | 0.5N |
Kidepo Valley National Park | DT | AT3 | A | 2005 | 454 | Rwetsiba & Wanyama, 2005 | 2 | 1,442 | 33.8E | 3.8N | |
Mgahinga Gorilla National Park | NP | IG3 | D | 2003 | 10 | Gray, quest. reply, 2005 | 3 | 67 | 29.6E | 1.4S | |
Murchison Falls Conservation Area | DT | AS3 | B | 2005 | 516 | 635 | Rwetsiba & Wanyama, 2005 | 1 | 4,064 | 31.8E | 2.2N |
Otze Forest | - | OG3 | E | 1998 | 200 | F. Michelmore, pers. comm., 1998 | 2 | 200 | 31.9E | 3.7N | |
Queen Elizabeth Conservation Area | DT | AS2 | B | 2006 | 2,959 | 1,476 | Freeman, 2006 | 2 | 2,148 | 30.0E | 0.2S |
Rwenzori National Park | NP | OG3 | E | 2003 | 20 | Keigwin, quest. reply, 2005 | 2 | 929 | 30.0E | 0.4N | |
Sango Bay | - | OG3 | E | 1998 | 30 | F. Michelmore, pers. comm., 1998 | 2 | 305 | 31.7E | 0.9S | |
Semliki National Park | - | OG3 | E | 1998 | 30 | F. Michelmore, pers. comm., 1998 | 2 | 195 | 30.0E | 0.8N | |
Toro (Semliki Valley) Wildlife Reserve | - | IG3 | D | 1998 | 80 | F. Michelmore, pers. comm., 1998 | 2 | 784 | 30.4E | 1.0N |
* Range of informed guess
1Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change
2Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.
3PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.