Tanzania, 1995

All Years for Tanzania: 2016 — 2013 — 2007 — 2002 — 1998 — 1995

1995 Summary Totals for Tanzania

Data Category	Definite	Probable	Possible
Aerial or Ground Total Counts	2,121	0	0
Aerial or Ground Sample Counts	71,338	12,199	12,199
Dung Counts	0	220	88
Informed Guesses, Undocumented Aerial or Dung Surveys and GIS Extrapolations	0	0	14
Total	73,459	12,419	12,301

No changes between current and previous report.

Tanzania : Elephant Estimates

	Survey Details²			Number of Elephants				Area	Map Location
Input Zone	Type	Reliab.	Year	Estimate	95% C.L.	Source	PFS³	(km²)	Lon.	Lat.
Burigi Game Reserve	AS2	B	1990	71	92	TWCM, 1992a	2	6,102	31.2E	2.3S
Katavi-Rukwa Area	AS2	B	1991	5,360	4,065	TWCM, 1992c	2	12,641	31.4E	7.0S
Kilimanjaro National Park	DC2	C	1990	220	88	TWCM, 1992a	3	418	37.3E	3.0S
Lake Manyara National Park	AT3	A	1990	149	0	TWCM, 1992a	4	246	35.6E	3.7S
Mkomazi Game Reserve	AT3	A	1994	300	0	Douglas-Hamilton et al., 1994	3	3,509	38.3E	4.2S
Moyowosi/Kigosi Area	AS2	B	1994	1,583	1,382	Farm, pers. comm., 1995b	2	21,869	31.3E	4.2S
Ruaha-Rungwe Ecosystem	AS2	B	1993	18,864	3,578	TWCM, 1993	1	41,927	34.4E	6.9S
Rubondo Island National Park	IG3	D	1990	14		TWCM, 1992a	4	400	31.9E	2.3S
Selous Ecosystem	AS2	B	1994	52,151	10,661	TWCM, 1995b	1	91,981	37.4E	8.9S
Serengeti Ecosystem	AT3	A	1994	1,672	0	TWCM, 1995b	2	21,413	35.0E	2.6S
Tarangire Ecosystem	AS2	B	1994	3,888	1,832	TWCM, 1995a	2	12,826	36.2E	4.1S
Ugalla River Game Reserve	AS2	B	1991	1,620	749	TWCM, 1992b	2	6,984	31.9E	5.8S

* Range of informed guess

¹Key to Causes of Change (only tracked since 2007): DA: Different Area; DD: Data Degraded; DT: Different Technique; NA: New Analysis; NG: New Guess; NP: New population; PL: Population Lost; RS: Repeat Survey (RS ́ denotes a repeat survey that is not statistically comparable for reasons such as different season); –––: No Change

²Key to Survey Types: AC: Aerial Count, not specified; AS: Aerial Sample Count; AT: Aerial Total Count; DC: Dung Count; EX: Extrapolation from GIS; GD: Genetic Dung Count; GS: Ground Sample Count; GT: Ground Total Count; IG: Informed Guess; IR: Individual Registration; OG: Other Guess. Survey Type is followed by an indicator of survey quality, ranked from 1 to 3 (best to worst). Survey Reliability is keyed A-E (best to worst) as outlined in this table.

³PFS: Priority for Future Surveys, ranked from 1 to 5 (highest to lowest). Based on the precision of estimates and the proportion of national range accounted for by the site in question, PFS is a measure of the importance and urgency for future population surveys. All areas of unassessed range have a priority of 1. See Introduction for details on how the PFS is derived.